W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Wednesday morning for Schema.org/Actions BOF? [was Re: The Vocabulary, Schema.org governance, etc.]

From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:20:59 +0200
Message-ID: <5422B72B.2020803@w3.org>
To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, Guha <guha@google.com>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
CC: W3C Vocabularies <public-vocabs@w3.org>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Everyone,

The W3C is happy to use one of the rooms during its "BOF" sessions on
Wednesday morning for a meeting around schema.org, Actions, and the
Social WG.

The meeting would be open to *everyone* at TPAC, not just Social WG
members and those from schema.org.

I hope this works for everyone!

The schedule is here:

http://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2014

A room will be reserved with this pre-set topic for 9:15 AM. We can
then continue as needed. Does this work for everyone?

  yours,
      harry


On 09/24/2014 01:21 PM, Harry Halpin wrote:
> Basically, people in the WG that while of course everyone is
> welcome as observers, some felt it would be unfair to give special
> treatment to non-members, particularly as people in the WG pointed
> out they could just join the WG and become members.
> 
> That being said, many people wanted a joint f2f between schema.org
> and Social WG members, in particular given the proposed direction
> of AS 2.0 and Acdtions, so we're working with Ian and TPAC to find
> a suitable time/place for a BOF over schema.org and Social WG.
> 
> Would Wednesday during the open-space session suit everyone?
> 
> Thursday has a number of conflicts for people in more than one WG 
> during TPAC.
> 
> On 09/24/2014 12:52 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
>> On 09/22/2014 06:03 PM, Guha wrote:
>>> I would prefer to not get into the issue of Google join the 
>>> Social WG at this point.
>>> 
>>> Also, it doesn't make sense for me to come if I cannot 
>>> participate in the discussion.
>>> 
>>> If you think it would be useful, and if you think TPAC rules
>>> are flexible enough to allow it, I would be happy to come and
>>> answer any questions the WG might have.
>> Hi Guha and Schema.org crew!
> 
>> First of all I would like to express my apologies for putting
>> out this premature (informal) invitation! To my understanding
>> group chairs have possibility to allow exceptions, still
>> yesterday during our weekly teleconf many people objected it. You
>> can find more details towards the end of these IMO quite chaotic
>> (and not approved yet) minutes 
>> http://www.w3.org/2014/09/23-social-minutes.html
> 
>> Due to constraints of practiced nowadays political bureaucracy, 
>> myself I can't join TPAC in person, but I still will participate 
>> remotely and I believe that some Social WG members present have 
>> interest in coordinating our work with schema.org team. Right
>> away I would like to support possibility of scheduling Web
>> Schemas session during TPAC!
> 
>> I will write in near future separate message with an overview of 
>> my evaluations of existing state of schema.org vocabulary in 
>> context of Social WG work. I just started yesterday a github 
>> repository to collect relevant examples and start gathering such 
>> feedback. Please feel free to gh:watch it already 
>> ("schema:FollowAction" almost would work here ;) ) 
>> https://github.com/w3c-social/schema.org-examples/issues/1
> 
>> I hope I didn't bring additional confusion to Schema.org <-> W3C 
>> Social WG relationship.
> 
>> With friendly greetings, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=FRNO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2014 12:21:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC