W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

RE: Schema.org proposal: New Actions and Actions contigent on an Offer

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 22:36:38 +0200
To: "'PublicVocabs'" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <067e01cfd5db$bfaf13f0$3f0d3bd0$@gmx.net>
Hi Vicki,

On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 11:21 PM, Vicki Tardif Holland wrote:
> In order to model the operation of devices and applications, we propose
> adding the following new Actions:
>
> http://schema.org/OperateAction
> http://schema.org/ActivateAction
> http://schema.org/DectivateAction
> http://schema.org/ResumeAction
> http://schema.org/SuspendAction

I do understand that you want to "group" those actions under OperateAction but what distinguishes OperateAction from an InteractAction (definition would need to be generalized to include devices) or an UpdateAction? IMHO, the definition of UpdateAction would fit quite well for those new actions:

   The act of managing by changing/editing the state of the object.


Thanks,
Markus


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Sunday, 21 September 2014 20:37:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC