W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: ItemList proposal

From: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 09:37:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOr1obFbpsMTrLPmxrLE_YF_iCyEz-pOc8cF35MgcwAQTdCJDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: "Jason Johnson (BING)" <jasjoh@microsoft.com>, PublicVocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

> -- We should turn itemListOrder into an Enum of fixed values (ascending,
> descending, unordered).
>


Sounds good to me.


> -- itemListElement currently has the range Thing or ListItem or Text,
> which is triple redundant ;) First, we always accept Text instead of Thing,
> and ListItem is a type of Thing. So the range is essentially Thing?
>

Yes. We were looking for a way to signal that there is a new class
ListItem, which allows authors to express more than the item. Perhaps this
is a suggestion we need better documentation.


> -- previousItem/nextItem has range ListItem. How do I capture the end of
> list? Is there a distinguished  NULL value?
>

I was imagining it working like a linked list. If a ListItem has no
nextItem, it is the end of the list.

- Vicki

Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com
Received on Friday, 12 September 2014 13:38:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC