- From: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:36:58 -0400
- To: Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com>
- Cc: Adrian Pohl <ad.pohl@gmail.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 09:54:31AM -0500, Wes Turner wrote: >It would be useful to have these properties with the type CreativeWork. Hmm. I would have preferred to see them go on something a bit more specific like MediaObject, but "embedded in a web page" is a pretty restrictive definition (and image/video/audio doesn't capture some of the formats like PDF / ODT that Adrian listed). Maybe it's time to broaden that type? >Is there a distinction between a CreativeWork and *renderings* of said >CreativeWork? Yes, there can be, using the associatedMedia / audio / image / video properties of CreativeWork, or... >How can we express that there is a PDF and an ODT of the same document? ... thanks to the workExample / exampleOfWork properties that were recently added to schema.org, you can express those relationships. See https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/pull/108 for a request to add examples for those properties to schema.org (where we express that there are both book editions and movie adaptations of a given novel). >-- >Wes Turner > > >On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Adrian Pohl <ad.pohl@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> we started working on draft recommendations for publishing metadata >> for open educational resources within a German-speaking KIM-DINI >> working group (KIM = Competence Centre Interoperable Metadata), see >> [1] (in German). For each metadata element we would like to recommend >> a rdf property at best from schema.org/LRMI. The bulk of the elements >> are already covered by schema.org. >> >> Anyhow, for indicating the size and format of a learning resource >> (this could be anything from a zip file, to odt, jpg, pdf, ppt etc.) I >> could't find other properties than schema:fileSize and >> schema:fileFormat. Currently, these properties are placed in the >> schema.org hierarchy at the type SoftwareApplication. >> >> As it would be very useful to have more generic properties to describe >> files, I suggest moving these properties up in the schema.org >> hierarchy to the type CreativeWork. What do you think? >> >> (For file size, there is another property schema:contentSize which is >> also too specific as it is associated with resources of type >> schema:MediaObject.) >> >> All the best >> Adrian >> >> [1] https://wiki.dnb.de/x/hq_kBQ >> >
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2014 15:37:28 UTC