W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: Move schema:fileSize & schema:fileFormat to schema:CreativeWork

From: Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 09:54:31 -0500
Message-ID: <CACfEFw9GzHQJ3n5qr3a+VL4yNfCjhUAUdm4+N_yCDnQab8UYxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Pohl <ad.pohl@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
It would be useful to have these properties with the type CreativeWork.

Is there a distinction between a CreativeWork and *renderings* of said

How can we express that there is a PDF and an ODT of the same document?
Wes Turner

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Adrian Pohl <ad.pohl@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> we started working on draft recommendations for publishing metadata
> for open educational resources within a German-speaking KIM-DINI
> working group (KIM = Competence Centre Interoperable Metadata), see
> [1] (in German). For each metadata element we would like to recommend
> a rdf property at best from schema.org/LRMI. The bulk of the elements
> are already covered by schema.org.
> Anyhow, for indicating the size and format of a learning resource
> (this could be anything from a zip file, to odt, jpg, pdf, ppt etc.) I
> could't find other properties than schema:fileSize and
> schema:fileFormat. Currently, these properties are placed in the
> schema.org hierarchy at the type SoftwareApplication.
> As it would be very useful to have more generic properties to describe
> files, I suggest moving these properties up in the schema.org
> hierarchy to the type CreativeWork. What do you think?
> (For file size, there is another property schema:contentSize which is
> also too specific as it is associated with resources of type
> schema:MediaObject.)
> All the best
> Adrian
> [1] https://wiki.dnb.de/x/hq_kBQ
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2014 14:54:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC