Yeah I think we meant the former, but that's a good point: do we need a more specific name perhaps? (sent from phone) On Oct 20, 2014 9:29 AM, "Vicki Tardif Holland" <vtardif@google.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:33 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ < > perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > >> does it only cover actions which use target (EntryPoint) and have errors >> 'on a wire'? >> >> for example CookAction could fail if I burn potatoes, would this also >> fit as an error? >> > > The original intent is the former. > > I'm not sure how to signal to the original Action sender to order take > out, but maybe we will get there. ;-) > > - Vicki > > Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com > >
Received on Monday, 20 October 2014 18:36:14 UTC