- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 18:53:56 +0200
- To: Sam Goto <goto@google.com>
- CC: "public-vocabs@w3.org Vocabs" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, danbri@google.com
On 10/13/2014 06:19 PM, Sam Goto wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:07 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ > <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org <mailto:perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>> > wrote: > > Hi, > > Based on discussions in Social WG around ActivityStreams2.0 I would like > to ask for help with clarifying something about schema.org > <http://schema.org> Action > subtree design. In particular how to recognize subtypes of schema:Action > defined outside of schema.org <http://schema.org> . > > > Would the basic schema.org extension mechanism > <http://schema.org/docs/extension.html> suffice here? > > That is, something like http://schema.org/InteractAction/HugAction work? I remember hearing about this Extension Mechanism based on / as 'old' and not strongly encouraged (maybe just rumors?). Do you know of real world examples where someone uses it? To my understanding this approach violates URI Opacity[1] and doesn't allow dereferencing terms 'extended' in such way. Looking at examples like http://bibliograph.net they extend schema.org types in their own namespace. I recommend recent slidedeck[2] by Richard Wallis eg. bgn:Thesis, http://bibliograph.net/Thesis [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#uri-opacity [2] http://www.slideshare.net/rjw/extending-schemaorg
Received on Monday, 13 October 2014 16:56:09 UTC