- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 11:59:28 +0200
- To: "'W3C Web Schemas Task Force'" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 6:49 PM, Sam Goto wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Vicki Tardif Holland wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:42 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: >> > BTW if that sounds like something with even slight possibly of making >> > sense I would propose to use term *ControlAction* for Viki's proposal >> > instead of *OperateAction* (operation/action) >> >> ControlAction sounds good to me. > > ControlAction makes sense to me too. Same here. I find ControlAction better than OperateAction and am fine with keeping this separate from UpdateAction for the time being... even though I find the separation quite fuzzy. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Monday, 6 October 2014 09:59:58 UTC