Re: New schema.org release (sdo-venkman) candidate for review

Just started reading but already have a request:
Could we remove '<meta itemprop="mainContentOfPage" content="true"/>' from
the ItemList example until the purpose of that property has been figured
out?

2014-11-17 19:07 GMT+01:00 Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>:

> Hi all
>
> Short version: we think we're pretty much done with a new release, see
> http://sdo-venkman.appspot.com/docs/releases.html#sdo-venkman
>
>
> Followers of schema.org may have noticed that we haven't made a new
> release
> of the site since mid-September. However if you have been following along
> on
> Github you'll notice that we have been busy integrating quite a few
> proposals
> and fixes. These are available in Git and as a test site as
> "sdo-venkman"(*).
>
> Pending changes are recorded in docs/releases.html:
>
> http://sdo-venkman.appspot.com/docs/releases.html#sdo-venkman
>
> The underlying schemas, examples, code all lives in Github at:
>
> https://github.com/danbri/schemaorg/tree/sdo-venkman
>
> There are still a few issues we hope to address before publishing these
> changes, see https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/issues for details. In
> particular, we expect to address
> https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/issues/148
> (VideoGameSeries). We also solicit advice on the proposed type for dated
> monetary values - see
> http://sdo-venkman.appspot.com/docs/releases.html#dated-money
> ... as we are not sure whether DatedMoneyValue would be better than the
> current proposal of DatedMoneyspecification. Former is shorter, latter is
> closer
> to some existing type names.
>
> Comments are welcome as always here or in Github (file an issue there
> for bugs or comment in an existing entry), or anywhere in the Web that
> has a URL.
>
> Since this update will cover a lot of topics, please  re-title the
> mail thread to indicate more specific topics. This is a large set of
> changes so
> there are bound to be a few bugs. If we can steer comments towards
> specifics
> and away from re-opening design earlier discussions that would help in
> getting these improvements published.
>
> Many thanks for your perspective,
>
> cheers,
>
> Dan,
> for schema.org.
>
>
> (*)
> Ghostbusters-based codenames let us choose version numbers later.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghostbusters#Cast
> (next release will be sdo-stantz...)
>
>