- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 17:44:35 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-vocabs@w3.org Vocabs" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 11/03/2014 05:21 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > Some of the vocabulary is very jarring. For exammple, what is a > "Natural Language Value"? Is is something that has as a value a string > in some natural language? Why not directly use strings with language > tags, instead of writing a lot of stuff that is hard to understand? > Similarly with Links. Why spend so much time talking about something > that is build in to RDF? Yesterday I proposed discussion for next Social WG teleconf (tomorrow) about removing as:Link from the AS2.0 spec: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2014-11-04#proposal:_remove_as:Link I also tried asking: "How RFC 5988 Link Relation fits Linked Data" on semantic-web list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2014Nov/0002.html
Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 16:46:43 UTC