Re: Mappings between schema.org and other vocabs (especially from W3C groups)

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com> wrote:

> > The scripts may still scrape parts of schema.org properly, but given
> all the activity in the past three years, I would not recommend to use
> http://schema.rdfs.org/ for serious projects without a careful
> investigation first.
>
> Thanks for the heads-up. As far as alternative approaches:
>
> A. Update the scrapers and scrapings
>

No need for scrappers anymore. Schema.org publishes structured data on all
its type and property pages, and the whole schema is available as RDFa at
http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html. It's only a matter of
converting it to your favorite format using a local tool or a service like
http://www.w3.org/2012/pyRdfa/ or http://rdf.greggkellogg.net/distiller.

Steph.


> B. ?
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 3:07 AM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org <
> martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:
>
>> Note that, while this was a laudable activitity, it has not been updated
>> since December, 2011 and also contains some bugs:
>>
>> For instance, the rdfs:isDefinedBy triples for properties link to all
>> types for which a property can be applied to, but should link to the
>> ontology from which the element stem:
>>
>>     rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://schema.org/Offer>;
>>     rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://schema.org/TypeAndQuantityNode>;
>>     rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://schema.org/Demand>;
>>     .
>>
>> The scripts may still scrape parts of schema.org properly, but given all
>> the activity in the past three years, I would not recommend to use
>> http://schema.rdfs.org/ for serious projects without a careful
>> investigation first.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> martin hepp
>> e-business & web science research group
>> universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
>>
>> e-mail:  martin.hepp@unibw.de
>> phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
>> fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
>> www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
>>          http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
>> skype:   mfhepp
>> twitter: mfhepp
>>
>> Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
>> =================================================================
>> * Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03 Nov 2014, at 09:43, Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > http://schema.rdfs.org/mappings.html lists:
>> >
>> > * DBPedia
>> > * DublinCore
>> > * FOAF
>> > * GoodRelations
>> > * SIOC
>> > * BIBO
>> > * WordNet
>> >
>> > (
>> https://github.com/mhausenblas/schema-org-rdf/blob/master/mappings.html )
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 4:10 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <
>> perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:
>> > Aloha,
>> >
>> > https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas#Introduction
>> > "In scope include collaborations on mappings, tools, extensibility and
>> > cross-syntax interoperability."
>> >
>> > Schema.org overlaps in many ways with other vocabularies, also those
>> > published under W3C namespace or currently under development in various
>> > W3C groups. Few examples:
>> >
>> > * http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/
>> > * http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-activitystreams-vocabulary-20141023/
>> > * http://www.hydra-cg.com/spec/latest/core/
>> > * https://web-payments.org/specs/source/vocabs/payswarm.html
>> >
>> > I know about at least one effort of providing some mappings:
>> > http://schema.rdfs.org/
>> >
>> > Still as for today, If I publish data online using Activity Streams 2.0,
>> > which ~= schema.org/Action, search engines sponsoring schema.org will
>> > not understand it.
>> >
>> > Maybe we could put more emphasis in WebSchemas group on coordinating
>> > development of vocabularies, at least among various W3C groups, and try
>> > to eventually provide official mappings to schema.org which search
>> > engines could adopt in their own pace?
>> >
>> > We could take as a concrete use case Activity Streams 2.0 which we
>> > currently work on in Social WG. As I mentioned it maps almost directly
>> > to schema.org/Action
>> >
>> > Mahalo
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Wes Turner
>> > https://westurner.github.io/
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Wes Turner
> https://westurner.github.io/
>



-- 
Steph.