W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > May 2014

Re: Proposal: "associatedMedia" property for schema.org/Thing (was: Why is the video property bound to creative work?)

From: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 15:40:39 -0400
To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Cc: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>, Jarno van Driel <jarno@quantumspork.nl>, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>, Laura Dawson <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com>, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20140520194037.GA24301@denials>
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:10:55AM -0500, Thad Guidry wrote:
>+1  That is fine for associatedMedia....but...web developers want more and
>expect more from us ... they have consistently been asking me for:

Quick and dirty proposal for associatedMedia is at
https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/associatedMediaToThing

>We still will need to move the "about" property onto Thing to solve a few
>more grand problems in Schema.org.

I suspect you're right about that, too. Poor Thing is getting heavier,
but at least CreativeWork is getting lighter in the bargain :)
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2014 19:41:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:41 UTC