W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > May 2014

Re: Email Message Definition?

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:33:28 -0400
Message-ID: <5377AB78.901@openlinksw.com>
To: public-vocabs@w3.org
On 5/16/14 7:10 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> [...]
>
> I think there's a difference of perspective here. For schema.org at
> least, it is perfectly fine to have a named subtype to indicate that
> some but not all CreativeWorks are EmailMessages, without requiring
> there to be distinguishing machine-friendly attributes for the
> subtype. So we're happy with it as-is currently.

I know you are, but that really isn't my point or particular concern, 
assuming schema.org is supposed to be a collaborative effort.

> Is there some
> specific application this this situation breaks?
>
> Dan
>
>

This isn't about breaking what exists, It's actually about understanding 
what's being described in the present by schema.org.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen







Received on Saturday, 17 May 2014 18:33:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:41 UTC