W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > May 2014

Re: ItemList

From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 22:39:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CADK2AU35uf2SkwX__5075i9babnbuLrKYR=T8UDZ0BR+_dwQ=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Cc: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Jason Douglas <jasondouglas@google.com>, Justin Boyan <jaboyan@google.com>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
+1

If nobody sees any trouble with it I'll mute myself than. I was just
thinking out loud.   :)


2014-05-13 22:31 GMT+02:00 martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org <
martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>:

> +1
>
> Let's not mix a mechanism for preserving ordered list with one for basic
> notions of meronomy (part-whole relationships). A list of parts can be
> ordered or unordered. An ordered list can reflect part-whole relationships
> or not. These are different perspectives.
> Of course, depending on the notion of parthood, elements in a list are
> parts of the list (or not), but this is not the important aspect here.
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> On 13 May 2014, at 22:25, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Jarno van Driel <
> jarnovandriel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Got it, thanks. And I can live with that just fine.
> >
> > Now I also was just looking at the periodicals proposal (
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Periodicals,_Articles_and_Multi-volume_Works)
> and wondered if there's any danger of ItemList having some overlap with the
> proposed @hasPart property. @hasPart's description in that proposal says:
> "A related CreativeWork that is included either logically or physically in
> this CreativeWork; for example, things in a collection, parts in a
> multi-part work, or articles in a periodical or publication issue."
> >
> > Now I could be wrong here but "things in a collection, parts in a
> multi-part work" both could be expressed with the properties of ItemList as
> well. So I don't know if that should be investigated further as well.
> >
> >
> > Jarno, you could express them that way...BUT we need to keep them
> separate since they handle 2 different kinds of uses...ItemList
> (editorialized list of things) and hasPart (things being a part of
> something, like a collection)   In other words...An ITEM IN A LIST does not
> equal An ITEM IN A COLLECTION.  2 different Types.
> >
> > --
> > -Thad
> > +ThadGuidry
> > Thad on LinkedIn
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2014 20:40:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:41 UTC