W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > March 2014

Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships

From: Vuk Milicic <vuk.milicic@eurecom.fr>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:55:24 +0100
Cc: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>, public-vocabs@w3.org, public-hydra@w3.org, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Michael Haschke <mhaschke@brox.de>
Message-Id: <48F3C0A8-8E2B-412B-A712-B4D793B82174@eurecom.fr>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Markus,

> OK.. this is quite similar to what we discussed in the Hydra CG (and what
> LDP does):
> 
>    </markus> a schema:Person ;
> 
>    </markus/friends/>:manages [
>       :subject </markus> ;
>       :property schema:knows
>    ] ;
> 
> The thing I don't really like with these approaches is that you have to peek
> into the container to find out whether it contains/manages the information
> you are interested in.

Conceptually, </marcus/friends> is not a container, but a class -- my point from the beginning.
That RDF is basically equivalent to what I wrote in [1] using OWL, why reinventing the wheel?

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2014Mar/0111.html

-
Vuk MIilcic
@faviki
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2014 18:55:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:38 UTC