W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > March 2014

RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:21:24 +0100
To: "'Peter F. Patel-Schneider'" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, <public-hydra@w3.org>, <public-lod@w3.org>, "'W3C Web Schemas Task Force'" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <013a01cf4857$09e745e0$1db5d1a0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 7:04 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> On 03/24/2014 08:24 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Markus
> >
> >
> > P.S.: I'm aware of how LDP handles this issue, but, while I generally
> > like the approach it takes, I don't like that fact that it imposes a
> > specific interaction model.
> >
> 
> So LDP handles this issue, and is going through the W3C process. Why
> not hold your nose and use it?  Or even better, participate and fix it?

Because in my opinion the model LDP is based on is doomed to fail. I expressed that concern a couple of times (at conferences where LDP was presented).. if I find the time (which will be tricky as I'm traveling from tomorrow onwards), I may even do a full review of the spec.


> PS:  It took me quite a while to figure out just that LDP was trying to
> do, and how it was proposing to do it.   That's probably a sign that
> more user-facing documentation is needed.

Yeah. LC ends April 2nd.. So perhaps you report your concerns as well :-P


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2014 18:22:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:38 UTC