W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Music schema proposal

From: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:30:22 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOr1obFAQ=vme04b9sKycu2ON=ueYupWqmxCZtf6FWTNxx9wjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Garrett <mark@moderndeveloperllc.com>
Cc: PublicVocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
I agree that instrumentation is an important field. It is complex enough
 that I think it should be added as part of a subsequent proposal so we
don't miss important details now.

- Vicki


Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com



On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Mark Garrett <mark@moderndeveloperllc.com>
wrote:

> Some work remains to synchronize with the proposal out of the Bib Extend
> Community group. In the meantime, please see the attached PDF or the test
> build pages:http://sdo-music.appspot.com/MusicComposition
>
> If I’m allowed to make a small suggestion. There is no field for the
> instrumentation of the composition. This is commonly referred to as “parts”
> for not only the instruments involved, but also vocals. This is rather
> important search information for orchestral and choral compositions.
>
> Examples:
>
> SATB; piano
> SSAA
> piano; double bass; piccalo trumpet; drums
> TTBB; violin I; violin II; viola, cello; bass; clarinet; oboe; horn;
> french horn; tuba
>
> — Mark
> ------
> Mark Garrett
> mark@moderndeveloperllc.com
>
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 16:30:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:42 UTC