- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 09:24:44 +0100
- To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 15 June 2014 09:21, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> On 15 June 2014 09:17, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:
>> On 06/07/2014 08:40 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
>>> On 7 June 2014 10:37, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:
>>>> On 04/14/2014 12:11 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
>>>>> On 14 April 2014 11:03, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
>>>>> <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:
>>>>>> FYI: I just created and populated a W3C wiki page for the topic:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/InverseProperties
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Martin! That's been on my todo list. However I don't yet see
>>>>> any content in the page ("There is currently no text in this page
>>>>> ..."), perhaps some problem saving it?
>>>>
>>>> Looking at:
>>>> http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/InverseProperties#Linking_from_member_pages_to_an_externally_defined_association.2C_sports_team_entity.2C_or_other_group
>>>>
>>>> I have impression that
>>>>
>>>> http://schema.org/member
>>>>
>>>> already has inverse property
>>>>
>>>> http://schema.org/memberOf
>>>
>>> Yes, indeed.
>>>
>>> In fact there's a new release of the site in preparation (I'll send a
>>> full msg monday) which makes 'inverse' relations navigable, as well as
>>> sub-property / super-property links in a property hierarchy too.
>>>
>>> See http://sdopending.appspot.com/member http://sdopending.appspot.com/memberOf
>>> http://sdopending.appspot.com/alumni etc.
>>>
>>> It would be very useful to collect any more pre-existing pairs of
>>> inverse properties here.
>> Lookes useful, though now everything except / gives HTTP 500!
>
> Sorry - fixing!
And we're back - http://sdopending.appspot.com/alumni
Dan
Received on Sunday, 15 June 2014 08:25:11 UTC