W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Schema.org v1.6 release candidate: Roles, various fixes, site navigation improvements

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 18:40:09 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=7jnH5XePdrX2EOKHFHoaJugyG_CX1s5cHKXQj5wGeUOw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Goto <goto@google.com>
Cc: Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>, Jason Douglas <jasondouglas@google.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 10 June 2014 18:32, Sam Goto <goto@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Sam Goto <goto@google.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +Sam, Jason
>>>
>>> On 10 June 2014 00:04, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Great!  Please note the content of:
>>> > http://sdopending.appspot.com/asset
>>>
>>> Ah, thanks. The property 'asset' didn't exist, except it is mentioned
>>> in http://sdopending.appspot.com/distance
>>>
>>> (aside: the reason that link doesn't have a normal 404 page is because
>>> 'asset' is now minimally mentioned in the RDFS configuration file
>>> where 'distance' is defined; I'll add QA tests to catch this kind of
>>> thing - i.e. terms that have no rdfs:comment, or multiple
>>> rdfs:comments)
>>>
>>>     <div typeof="rdf:Property" resource="http://schema.org/distance">
>>>       <span class="h" property="rdfs:label">distance</span>
>>>       <span property="rdfs:comment">A sub property of asset. The
>>> distance travelled.</span>
>>>       <link property="rdfs:subPropertyOf" href="http://schema.org/asset"
>>> />
>>>     ...etc
>>>    </div>
>>>
>>> http://schema.org/distance "A sub property of asset. The distance
>>> travelled."
>>>
>>> Sam, Jason - looks like there was expected to be an 'asset' property
>>> on Action, at some point. I find it hard to see how the notion of
>>> asset applies naturally to a 'distance' on an exercise or travel
>>> action.
>>>
>>> I suggest:
>>>
>>> 1. We drop the phrase "A sub property of asset." from
>>> http://schema.org/distance.
>>
>>
>> (1) SGTM
>
>
> I mean (1) AND (2) SGTM.

Thanks for the sanity check. Done -
https://github.com/danbri/schemaorg/commit/67ca7d685823566242aecdd4a8e63452ed6e6248

Let's fold this into 1.6, it shouldn't break anything and it fixes a
screaming bug. And thanks Aaron for spotting!

Dan


>>> 2. I delete the assertion that 'distance' has a superproperty 'asset'.
>>>
>>> How does that sound?
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> There is a temporary review build of schema.org v1.6 for your
>>> >> consideration.
>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2014 17:40:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:42 UTC