W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > June 2014

Re: How do you flag a resource which is not available anymore?

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:32:08 -0400
Message-ID: <538CD138.7040901@openlinksw.com>
To: public-vocabs@w3.org
On 6/2/14 2:47 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> What is worse in the situation Bernard describes is that the domain 
> name may be resold and re-used, but unrelated to the original 
> vocabulary. Although unlikely, some vocabulary items may resolve in 
> the future, but to something entirely unrelated. In that case, part of 
> the message needs to be something like: this has been determined to be 
> unresolvable; do not attempt resolution.
>
> kc 

<#this> . # Is implicit and as a consequence problematic, as per 
Bernard's situation.

<#this> wdrs:describedby <SomeDocURL.ttl> .  # is explicit and loosely 
coupled rather than implicit and tightly coupled.

<SomeDocURL.ttl> xhv:describes <#this> . # is also explicit and loosely 
coupled rather than implicit and tightly coupled.

An RDF processor [1] can make sense of implicit and explicit denotation 
and connotation.

Links:

[1] http://linkeddata.uriburner.com:8000/vapour -- will make sense of 
RDF document content based on RDF relations i.e., it's coded to handle 
explicit and implicit relations in regards to HTTP URI based denotation 
and connotation.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen







Received on Monday, 2 June 2014 19:32:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:42 UTC