W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > June 2014

Re: How do you flag a resource which is not available anymore?

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:32:08 -0400
Message-ID: <538CD138.7040901@openlinksw.com>
To: public-vocabs@w3.org
On 6/2/14 2:47 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> What is worse in the situation Bernard describes is that the domain 
> name may be resold and re-used, but unrelated to the original 
> vocabulary. Although unlikely, some vocabulary items may resolve in 
> the future, but to something entirely unrelated. In that case, part of 
> the message needs to be something like: this has been determined to be 
> unresolvable; do not attempt resolution.
> kc 

<#this> . # Is implicit and as a consequence problematic, as per 
Bernard's situation.

<#this> wdrs:describedby <SomeDocURL.ttl> .  # is explicit and loosely 
coupled rather than implicit and tightly coupled.

<SomeDocURL.ttl> xhv:describes <#this> . # is also explicit and loosely 
coupled rather than implicit and tightly coupled.

An RDF processor [1] can make sense of implicit and explicit denotation 
and connotation.


[1] http://linkeddata.uriburner.com:8000/vapour -- will make sense of 
RDF document content based on RDF relations i.e., it's coded to handle 
explicit and implicit relations in regards to HTTP URI based denotation 
and connotation.



Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Monday, 2 June 2014 19:32:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:42 UTC