Re: schema.org update, v1.8: added WebSite type; broadened isPartOf to relate CreativeWorks

"I notice you don’t have an itemprop attribute in your first <div> element.
 Was that intentional?"

That would only have been possible if 'hasPart' (which isn't part of the
specification) could have been used (or itemprop-reverse="isPartOf").

Because there is no inverse property of 'isPartOf', nor a reverse mechanism
for microdata, Juraj is bound to chain the entities together by making use
of <link itemprop="isPartOf" href="[itemid-value]">.

A cumbersome method, that now can be applied where it first couldn't. All
be it but one that can be improved still.


2014-07-31 17:52 GMT+02:00 Jason Johnson (BING) <jasjoh@microsoft.com>:

>  I notice you don’t have an itemprop attribute in your first <div>
> element.  Was that intentional?
>
>
>
> *From:* Juraj Kabát [mailto:kabat.juraj@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 29, 2014 8:08 AM
> *To:* public-vocabs@w3.org
> *Cc:* W3C Web Schemas Task Force
> *Subject:* Re: schema.org update, v1.8: added WebSite type; broadened
> isPartOf to relate CreativeWorks
>
>
>
> When Ill try to add isPartOf property to ItemList, Im getting this warning:
>
> WARNING: isPartOf field not specified in http://schema.org/ItemList
>
> Example snippet:
> <body itemid="#WebPage" itemscope itemtype="
> http://schema.org/CollectionPage">
>     <div class="products" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ItemList">
>         <meta content="Unordered" itemprop="itemListOrder">
>         <link itemprop="isPartOf" href="#WebPage">
>
>         <div itemtype="http://schema.org/Product" itemscope
> itemprop="itemListElement">
>         <img src="[url]" itemprop="image">
>         <a href="[url]" itemprop="url"><span
> itemprop="name">[name]</span></a>
>       <span itemtype="http://schema.org/Offer" itemscope
> itemprop="offers">
>             <span itemprop="price">[price]</span>
>       </span>
>         </div>
>
>         <div itemtype="http://schema.org/Product" itemscope
> itemprop="itemListElement">
>         <img src="[url]" itemprop="image">
>         <a href="[url]" itemprop="url"><span
> itemprop="name">[name]</span></a>
>       <span itemtype="http://schema.org/Offer" itemscope
> itemprop="offers">
>             <span itemprop="price">[price]</span>
>       </span>
>         </div>
>
>     </div>
> </body>
>
>  But when Ill add isPartOf property to each ItemListElement, everything
> works like expected.
> What am I missing here? ItemList extends CreativeWork as well...
>
> Why can't I chain whole ItemList to parent but instead of that I have to
> repeat myself for every element in list?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>  Personally I most of all like the addition of WebSite (and it's creative
> example) as well as the reworked 'isPartOf' most and I've already started
> to implementing them.  :-)
>
>
>
> But I would have been an even happier camper if 'hasPart' would have been
> introduced as well. And even though chaining WebSite > WebPage >
> WebPageElements > CreativeWork now can be achieved, without abusing
> 'mentions' for this, it unfortunately is quite cumbersome in microdata
> because one has to use itemid quite a lot, eg:
>
>
>
> <body itemid="#WebPage" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/WebPage">
>
> <nav itemid="#SiteNavigationElement" itemscope itemtype="
> http://schema.org/SiteNavigationElement">
>
> <link itemprop="isPartOf" href="#WebPage">
>
> <ul>
>
> <li itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/WebPage" itemid="#WebPage-1">
>
> <link itemprop="isPartOf" href="#SiteNavigationElement">
>
> <a itemprop="url" href="[some-page-url]">
>
> <span itemprop="name">[some-page-name]</span>
>
> </a>
>
> <ul>
>
> <li itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/WebPage">
>
> <link itemprop="isPartOf" href="#WebPage-1" />
>
> <a itemprop="url" href="[some-page-url]">
>
> <span itemprop="name">[some-page-name]</span>
>
> </a>
>
> </li>
>
> <li itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/WebPage">
>
> <link itemprop="isPartOf" href="#WebPage-1" />
>
> <a itemprop="url" href="[some-page-url]">
>
> <span itemprop="name">[some-page-name]</span>
>
> </a>
>
> </li>
>
> </ul>
>
> </li>
>
> </ul>
>
> </nav>
>
> </body>
>
>
>
> I'm still quite pleased with the update is as though.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2014-07-28 17:43 GMT+02:00 Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>:
>
>
>
> previous update (1.7),
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014Jul/0012.html
>
> A small schema.org update just went live:
>
> 1. We add a new CreativeWork type, "WebSite"
>
> http://schema.org/WebSite
>
> "A WebSite is a set of related web pages and other items typically
> served from a single web domain and accessible via URLs."
>
> The example shows the use of this with SearchAction.
>
> 2. We adopt the proposal made by the bibextend group and other
> collaborators, to broaden isPartOf. It now relates any CreativeWork to
> any other CreativeWork
>
> http://schema.org/isPartOf
>
> see also
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Periodicals,_Articles_and_Multi-volume_Works
>
> 3. Potential Actions documentation
>
> The previously PDF-only Potential Actions document is now on the site in
> HTML:
>
> http://schema.org/docs/actions.html
>
> 4. Adopted some markup fixes from Stephane Corlosquet (thanks!)
>
> https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/pull/71
>
> 5. Improved consistency of encoding / associatedMedia description
> (thanks Dan Scott!)
>
> https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/pull/35
>
> 6. Updated some out-of-date sections of the FAQ: it now mentions
> Yandex appropriately, acknowledges that there's life beyond Microdata
> (i.e. RDFa, JSON-LD), and doesn't talk about "version 0.9 draft" any
> more.
>
>  https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/pull/69
>
> Thanks all :)
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 31 July 2014 22:40:50 UTC