Re: Question about schema.org in a triple store?

On 16 July 2014 16:45, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:

> Kingsley is pretty much spot on.
>
> 1. Give attribution to Schema.org, could be as simple as an included
> readme.txt that says "Thanks DanBri and Schema.org stakeholders! You saved
> our asses on this project!" ...
> 2. Also you must provide a link to the Schema.org license:
> http://schema.org/docs/terms.html  (somewhere, anywhere, in your project,
> website, extended vocabulary, whatever, wherever) ... and ...
> 3. Document and share with the world in that same readme.txt or website,
> or wherever, of any changes you may have made to Schema.org vocabulary or
> developed extension / terms to the vocabulary that you have made as well.
> 4. Your done !
>

Thanks for the steps.

But back to my original question.  If I am running a data triple store, am
I required to do this?

If so, how, if I just have a database, and not a website, or source code
repository?


>
> In fact... I would encourage the stakeholders and DanBri to actually put
> something like those 4 steps into the Schema.org license link to make it
> easy to understand for anyone unfamiliar with CC-BY-SA.
>
> +1 Make it easier for developers and contributors to actually DO the
> Sharealike by providing some simple steps such as above !  Otherwise,
> change the darn license to just CC-BY.
>
> --
> -Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 7/16/14 8:15 AM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote:
>>
>>> That is understood, but the key issue for some adopters seems to be
>>>
>>>         • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the
>>> material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as
>>> the original.
>>>
>>> If you develop a commercial product or specificiation that builds upon
>>> schema.org, thus binds you to release the result under a Creative
>>> Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, too.
>>>
>>> The question is what "remix, transform, or build upon the material"
>>> means. For instance, if you add schema.org markup to your HTML, does
>>> that mean that your whole HTML page must be released the under a Creative
>>> Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license?
>>>
>>> There are potential implications that are problematic for adopters of
>>> schema.org.
>>>
>>> This is why GoodRelations uses the broader Creative Commons Attribution
>>> 3.0 license, which just requires attribution.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Ultimately, this issue always come back to the same issue of Attribution.
>>
>> You shouldn't reuse the creative works of others without attribution,
>> bottom line.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kingsley Idehen
>> Founder & CEO
>> OpenLink Software
>> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
>> Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com
>> Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
>> Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
>> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
>> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>> Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
>>
>>
>>
>