Re: better description of schema.org

Well, I don't have anything to add, as I don't understand what is there.

peter

On 02/10/2014 12:15 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 2/10/14 1:23 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> I'm trying to navigate around this description of schema.org, but I'm not 
>> seeing anything beyond asimple top-level paragraph. How do I getto the 
>> other stuff?
>
> What would like to add? If you have a URL to some document, or an older 
> post, then I can take a look and get back to you in regards to fleshing 
> things out.
>
> On an related note, look at the post [1] I published about integrating FOAF 
> an Schema.org using an owl:equivalentClass relation.
>
> Link:
>
> [1] http://bit.ly/MyzbAh -- Class equivalence based reasoning and inference 
> using Schema.org .
>
> Kingsley
>>
>> peter
>>
>> On 02/04/2014 11:28 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>>> On 2/4/14 1:40 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>>> Well, I did propose something not so long ago.
>>>>
>>>> peter
>>>
>>> Peter,
>>>
>>> I too have a rudimentary description [1] in a glossary document I maintain 
>>> [2]. I suspect we can mesh this work over time etc..
>>>
>>> Links:
>>>
>>> [1] http://bit.ly/1doUPgl -- description of Schema.org
>>> [2] http://bit.ly/1cchBvV -- Glossary .
>>>
>>> Kingsley
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Monday, 10 February 2014 21:41:50 UTC