W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > December 2014

RE: schema.org sdo-venkman release is now live as v1.92

From: Tom Marsh <tmarsh@exchange.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 23:36:28 +0000
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Paul Watson <lazarus@lazaruscorporation.co.uk>
CC: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BL2PR03MB1142771B304322CF9A80ACCE56B0@BL2PR03MB114.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
It looks like sdo-stantz is missing the colorPalette property and ColorPalette type. Are those still to be incorporated?

Also, should materials be singular (material) instead? I thought we were avoiding plurals.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Brickley [mailto:danbri@google.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 10:39 AM
To: Paul Watson
Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force
Subject: Re: schema.org sdo-venkman release is now live as v1.92

On 16 December 2014 at 18:26, Paul Watson <lazarus@lazaruscorporation.co.uk> wrote:
> On 15/12/14 17:27, Dan Brickley wrote:
>> On 15 December 2014 at 17:09, Paul Watson 
>> <lazarus@lazaruscorporation.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On 12/12/14 09:28, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
>>>> On 12/11/2014 04:37 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
>>>>> We have just 'soft launched' the large package of improvements 
>>>>> recently circulated as the 'venkman' release. While they are 
>>>>> intended as the foundation for a "version 2.0" release we wanted 
>>>>> to get the vocabulary improvements out there ASAP without rushing 
>>>>> to v2 prematurely. There's a lot more that could be said about 
>>>>> each set of changes (Music, Video games, Sports, ItemList / 
>>>>> breadcrumbs, etc etc.) than we can say today, so for now we'll 
>>>>> stick with a simple "thank you!" to all who have participated in 
>>>>> this effort. Thanks :)
>>>>> As always our issue tracker is open to all for any bugs that have 
>>>>> crept in. You'll find it linked from:
>>>>> Release notes: http://schema.org/docs/releases.html#v1.92

>>>> Great work! + kudos to everyone who contributed ☆
>>>> also glad to see on github a *milestone* for the next one \o/
>>> +1 great work
>>> Would be great if we could get  schema.org/VisualArtwork released as 
>>> some point - it's been waiting for a very long time and seems to get 
>>> ignored from every release
>> Funny you should mention that! Vicki and I were just chatting about 
>> it earlier. Sorry this is taking so long, ... but here we go:
>> https://github.com/danbri/schemaorg/commit/97b9c5c1d35ad9cd911c300402

>> 5e5678467183b9 http://sdo-stantz.appspot.com/VisualArtwork

>> Where 'stantz' is the codename for whatever the next release ends up 
>> being called, i.e. the milestone in Github that elf Pavlik spotted.
>> We need to translate the examples to other formats but other than 
>> that I think this looks good.
>> I've opened a bug in github to track this (things are slowly 
>> migrating over from W3C wiki/tracker),
>> https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/issues/204

>> cheers,
>> Dan
> That's excellent news!
> I attempted to add the Microdata and JSON format examples in Github 
> today, as well as adding the missing artEdition property.
> You should have pull requests for those two changes (so long as I 
> worked on the correct branches)

Yes I think that workflow makes sense - I pulled those edits into my sdo-visualwork then from there I made a new pull request that puts them into sdo-stantz. That's maybe a bit indirect but keeps things clear. I don't live-and-breath Git(hub) workflow methodologies so there's a certain amount of making-it-up-as-we-go-along happening here. Anyway,  I've merged it in via
https://github.com/danbri/schemaorg/pull/33 "danbri wants to merge 4 commits into sdo-stantz from sdo-visualwork"


http://sdo-stantz.appspot.com/artEdition ... seem to show the changes just fine, thanks :)


Received on Friday, 19 December 2014 23:36:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:46 UTC