W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > December 2014

Re: schema.org sdo-venkman release is now live as v1.92

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:39:04 +0000
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=7QGutVqS3fJqJEiFSZEe4zJpTErzMzM95=jkTcMCkNjw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Watson <lazarus@lazaruscorporation.co.uk>
Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 16 December 2014 at 18:26, Paul Watson
<lazarus@lazaruscorporation.co.uk> wrote:
> On 15/12/14 17:27, Dan Brickley wrote:
>> On 15 December 2014 at 17:09, Paul Watson
>> <lazarus@lazaruscorporation.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On 12/12/14 09:28, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
>>>> On 12/11/2014 04:37 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
>>>>> We have just 'soft launched' the large package of improvements
>>>>> recently circulated as the 'venkman' release. While they are intended
>>>>> as the foundation for a "version 2.0" release we wanted to get the
>>>>> vocabulary improvements out there ASAP without rushing to v2
>>>>> prematurely. There's a lot more that could be said about each set of
>>>>> changes (Music, Video games, Sports, ItemList / breadcrumbs, etc etc.)
>>>>> than we can say today, so for now we'll stick with a simple "thank
>>>>> you!" to all who have participated in this effort. Thanks :)
>>>>> As always our issue tracker is open to all for any bugs that have
>>>>> crept in. You'll find it linked from:
>>>>> Release notes: http://schema.org/docs/releases.html#v1.92
>>>> Great work! + kudos to everyone who contributed ☆
>>>> also glad to see on github a *milestone* for the next one \o/
>>> +1 great work
>>> Would be great if we could get  schema.org/VisualArtwork released as some
>>> point - it's been waiting for a very long time and seems to get ignored
>>> from
>>> every release
>> Funny you should mention that! Vicki and I were just chatting about it
>> earlier. Sorry this is taking so long, ... but here we go:
>> https://github.com/danbri/schemaorg/commit/97b9c5c1d35ad9cd911c3004025e5678467183b9
>> http://sdo-stantz.appspot.com/VisualArtwork
>> Where 'stantz' is the codename for whatever the next release ends up
>> being called, i.e. the milestone in Github that elf Pavlik spotted.
>> We need to translate the examples to other formats but other than that
>> I think this looks good.
>> I've opened a bug in github to track this (things are slowly migrating
>> over from W3C wiki/tracker),
>> https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/issues/204
>> cheers,
>> Dan
> That's excellent news!
> I attempted to add the Microdata and JSON format examples in Github today,
> as well as adding the missing artEdition property.
> You should have pull requests for those two changes (so long as I worked on
> the correct branches)

Yes I think that workflow makes sense - I pulled those edits into my
sdo-visualwork then from there I made a new pull request that puts
them into sdo-stantz. That's maybe a bit indirect but keeps things
clear. I don't live-and-breath Git(hub) workflow methodologies so
there's a certain amount of making-it-up-as-we-go-along happening
here. Anyway,  I've merged it in via
https://github.com/danbri/schemaorg/pull/33 "danbri wants to merge 4
commits into sdo-stantz from sdo-visualwork"

http://sdo-stantz.appspot.com/artEdition ... seem to show the changes
just fine, thanks :)

Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2014 18:39:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:46 UTC