W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > December 2014

Re: sponsor more

From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 11:48:58 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGR+nnGmys3YEFwcXRRgDuCRHR4_xiLD0teP+Nf-kopR7J+=FQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chaals from Yandex <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Vincent Velema <vincent@daarom.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
+1 for generalizing the sponsor property. In my case, it's for listing the
sponsors of an event.

@Chaals, I'm confused by your note re recipient. are you referring to
http://schema.org/recipient? What does it have to do with the sponsor
property?

Steph.


On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:33 AM, <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:

> 27.11.2014, 19:49, "Vincent Velema" <vincent@daarom.com>:
>
>
> I was just marking up another project and I ran into a limitation of the
> sponsor property, as this is only used on MedicalStudy, I get another red
> warning in sdtt. I would like to markup an Organization that is the sponsor
> of another Organization (charity) or an event.
> Example: https://gist.github.com/daarom/166764c876d58870247f
>
> I assume schema should be expanded to make this possible, correct?
>
>
> That looks like a sensible thing to do.
>
> I think "recipient" is a badly-named property, and we should think about a
> better name for it (less generic, or change the meaning substantially - or
> both).
>
>
>
> If this is correct, where do I make a request to make such
> changes/improvements?
>
>
> Here :)
>
> cheers
>
> Chaals
>
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
>
>
Received on Monday, 1 December 2014 16:49:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:46 UTC