- From: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:26:52 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@unibw.de>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>, David Marland <david.marland@bbc.co.uk>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Richard Wallis <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>, Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 08:19:14AM -0700, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >That's putting quite a burden on the client. > >Big clients, such as those that can be produced by Google and Yahoo, >might have access to sufficient information to handle situations where >data routinely does not match the schema. However, small and medium >clients are going to be in a much worse situation. How are they to >proceed? For my own *very small* cases, I'll be working with a handful of sites and will adjust my client to handle the quirks of each sites accordingly. In some ways I suspect it will be easier for the small clients. Dan
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2014 15:27:22 UTC