Re: Buyer / Seller / Provider Re-Design

I don't understand the ">" shorthand in the Proposal Alpha listings.  E.g.:

6. Deprecate vendor in favor of BuyAction > seller

What does "in favor of BuyAction > seller" mean - i.e what does the ">"
represent in this construction?


On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Jason Johnson (BING) <jasjoh@microsoft.com>
wrote:

>  Hi All,
>
>
>
> Following up on a thread which went stale back in June, Vicki and Dan @
> Google + myself formalized the prior public discussions into a pair of
> alternative vocabulary re-designs.  We then generated a (hopefully)
> canonical set of use cases to help validate and map those alternatives.  We
> would like to re-start the stale discussion using this more formal proposal
> in the hopes that we can drive consensus ASAP.
>
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/File:ProviderSellerVocabularyRe-DesignProposal.pdf
>
>
>
> Please read through the PDF and …
>
> - provide feedback on the proposed model of exchanges
>
> - provide feedback on the two alternative proposals, ideally favoring one
> more than the other (we can’t decide ourselves)
>
> - review the canonical examples we have generated and share any that we
> are missing – especially if neither alternative vocab addresses them
>
>
>
> We hope to move forward with one of these solutions ASAP and look forward
> to your input!
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> *Jason Johnson*
>
> Microsoft
>
>
>