W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > April 2014

Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships

From: Luca Matteis <lmatteis@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 23:12:11 +0200
Message-ID: <CALp38EO83GAi6Of=dQTqfbbkt9Yu9jVuDzaH_aUZZqJoeN_pYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com> wrote:
> Whilst Peter may have some memory lapses about some ambiguous parts of the
> OWL spec :), I do not believe that he has false memories of co-editing the
> second edition of the RDF Semantics document.
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-mt-20140225/

Sorry didn't know he was the co-editor of the spec. Anyway it doesn't
hurt to clarify whether RDF actually holds any meaning for triples. I
always presumed that was part of the vocabularies and not part of RDF.
Received on Sunday, 13 April 2014 21:12:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:39 UTC