- From: Luca Matteis <lmatteis@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 23:12:11 +0200
- To: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com> wrote: > Whilst Peter may have some memory lapses about some ambiguous parts of the > OWL spec :), I do not believe that he has false memories of co-editing the > second edition of the RDF Semantics document. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-mt-20140225/ Sorry didn't know he was the co-editor of the spec. Anyway it doesn't hurt to clarify whether RDF actually holds any meaning for triples. I always presumed that was part of the vocabularies and not part of RDF.
Received on Sunday, 13 April 2014 21:12:38 UTC