W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > April 2014

Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work?

From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 12:57:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAChbWaMWoXD3AS3rVPFwQ=LfxuTqbTvio5T=TzW=sHBEqogvEA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Laura Dawson <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com>
Cc: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, Jarno van Driel <jarno@quantumspork.nl>, "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
In Freebase, we found it useful to have properties for expressing an
"about" through the use of "Subject of" and "Subjects"...(delegated Subject

Subjects <https://www.freebase.com/common/topic/subjects?schema=>

   - menu


Subjects of this topic. This property is to be used as the basis of
delegated "subjects" properties on other types.
masterSubject of <https://www.freebase.com/common/topic/subject_of?schema=>



Different things (films, books, songs, etc.) this topic is the subject of.
I could envision http://schema.org/Thing having those 2 properties as well,
which probably could take care of a number of issues, although not a
"related to" issue.

I would vote "no" to any relatedness properties on Thing itself for now
until further discussion with SKOS is accumulated and lands in Schema.org.

+ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2014 17:58:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:39 UTC