W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > April 2014

Re: clinical entities - structures

From: Marc Twagirumukiza <marc.twagirumukiza@agfa.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 10:44:28 +0200
To: medicalentity@googlegroups.com, public-vocabs@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFCD7BE99F.5FE01BF7-ONC1257CB1.002EFA5D-C1257CB1.00301E4D@agfa.com>
+1 This makes sense. Actually we were already suggesting this property 
'muscleAction'  in our incubator. Thus from our side it's a good solution.
If we have other small changes suggestion a part the the next set of new 
procedure related proposal, we will be back to you.

Kind Regards,

Marc Twagirumukiza 



From:   Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
To:     medicalentity@googlegroups.com
Date:   05/04/2014 09:35
Subject:        Re: clinical entities - structures
Sent by:        medicalentity@googlegroups.com



On 30 January 2014 14:53, Marc Twagirumukiza <twamarc@gmail.com> wrote:
The starting point is to discuss what basic structure/model to follow.

To agree on :
1 - We are not re-design medicalEntity of schema.org, we are just 
extending it.

Thanks for starting this discussion! Please don't be afraid to suggest 
changes (hopefully small) if you think there are problems with current 
vocabulary.

In fact, schema.org propose a small change that I would like feedback on:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014Apr/0010.html

We would like to change the meaning of http://schema.org/action from a 
medical/health concept about muscles, to use in our general purpose 
"Actions protocol".

The suggestion is that 'action' is renamed 'muscleAction' instead. Please 
let me know ASAP if this would cause problems here.

Dan
-- 
Received on Saturday, 5 April 2014 08:45:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:39 UTC