Re: Proposal: Audiobook

On 27 September 2013 17:00, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
> In that case, Dan.
>
> +1 to getting rid of all your work, and just put 1,000,000 properties under
> THING.  Done. :)

http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:List_of_properties/all comes close...

> I still stand firmly, rigidly, on practical use of Schema.org and
> sub-types.... and someone does have to absorb the cost, but with someone
> bearing the cost, others reap the benefits including the Schema.org
> stakeholders, which was the whole initial point of Schema.org...least you
> forget.

I'm not saying we shouldn't care about the schema hierarchy and
property/type associations; just that there are other techniques
available that may help publishers understand the most
useful/interesting things to say about each type, rather than (as we
do now) list all the potentially relevant properties.

Dan

Received on Friday, 27 September 2013 16:12:48 UTC