W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2013

Re: CreativeWork relationships

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:05:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=7z2JAavrtj6b7Qhwpibr39PXFEk12fzVdGQ-vaMXDUgA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
Cc: "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 20 September 2013 14:48, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com> wrote:
> All four of these properties seem like good additions. Some care will need
> to go into the descriptions so it is clear that my paperback Moby Dick is an
> example of Moby Dick while the Moby Dick: The Graphic Novel is based on the
> original.
>
> This may be too far afield, but has there been any thought to a
> 'refersToWork' to capture the relationship between commentaries and
> criticisms to the original work. A commentary on Othello is not an example
> of Othello or based on Othello, but it would be nice to note that
> relationship.

(liking this general direction...)

We also already have http://schema.org/mentions - "Indicates that the
CreativeWork contains a reference to, but is not necessarily about a
concept."

Dan
Received on Friday, 20 September 2013 15:06:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:31 UTC