W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Review: ReviewBody or description?

From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 10:29:43 -0500
Message-ID: <CAChbWaP8c6tD6P+5fiV3Cd29_Z7YrMmYhbAfUwp=KCmc2x+6ng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Willem-Siebe Spoelstra <wsspoelstra@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>

I would choose using 'reviewBody' if your working with Product or Service
Reviews.  It will be more meaningful than just schema.org/Review -->
'description' , which leaves my brain wondering, and probably would do the
same for parsers. :-)

'description' is borrowed from the highest type.... Thing.  So it really is
saying schema.org/Thing --> 'description' , which is not very useful in
your case, is it ? :-)

Always look at the borrowed property and which Type it was borrowed FROM,
to make sense of it.

Thad on Freebase.com <http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry>
Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2013 15:30:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:30 UTC