W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > October 2013

Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org

From: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:41:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMpDgVwJaRy0=kCu4Xe6ieNhe3H_1Zzp3NsDthhrK2sbjyTwBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Guha <guha@google.com>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, W3C Vocabularies <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Hopefully this will happen in the soon-coming weeks.

peter



On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Guha <guha@google.com> wrote:

> Peter,
>
>  Very good point.  The documentation on schema.org is targeted mainly at
> webmasters, who are looking for concrete directions on how to do the
> markup. That said, we should add material to address the kinds of issues
> you have raised. Hope to do that in the coming weeks.
>
> guha
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <
> pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Only marginally.  Most of what it says is about the types and properties
>> defined at http://schema.org, and very little of it is about the data
>> model of schema.org or how surface syntaxes there actually work.
>>
>> Of course, for someone who can make good guesses about reality, there is
>> information to be gleaned therein, but that doesn't change the status of
>> the human-readable information available from schema.org
>>
>> peter
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 00:41:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:32 UTC