W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > October 2013

Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org

From: Guha <guha@google.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 20:54:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPAGhv_ebjS_kf91SdwJd4ecr2Gt=F54rsk5YHkkG_=GuMhfbA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: W3C Vocabularies <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Well, we certainly have a fair number of websites that don't consider it
too strange to use. And they seem to think they are using it for real.

I am now curious about what you find strange about it.

guha


On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <
pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:

> The purpose of this exercise was mostly curiosity in the end, at least
> after I discovered all the strangenesses, but certainly started with desire
> to use schema.org information for real.
>
> peter
>
> On Oct 24, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Guha <guha@google.com> wrote:
>
> > Mostly right. See below for corrections. What is the purpose of this
> 'reconstruction', if I may ask?
> >
> > guha
>
>
Received on Friday, 25 October 2013 03:54:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:32 UTC