W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > October 2013

Re: SKOS and Freebase

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 06:34:27 -0700
Message-ID: <52652D63.3060002@kcoyle.net>
To: public-vocabs@w3.org
Thad, linking may be easier with FAST[1] than LCSH. LCSH is 
pre-coordinated, so it has strings like:

Confucianism --China --Rituals.

which won't match any topics outside of the library world. FAST has 
taken LCSH and broken the pre-coordinated topics into separate statements:


FAST is available as linked data.

[1] http://experimental.worldcat.org/fast/

On 10/20/13 6:40 PM, Thad Guidry wrote:
> Tom is correct.
> Let's be clear, the data still has to be linked for LCSH concepts. There
> is much work to be done on that front.
> I have been continually applying most high level LCSH concepts to
> Freebase manually, but a better interface for human curation and
> aligning and linking the LCSH concepts to Freebase is what is needed
> (but a lot of that could be done with OpenRefine and other automated
> tools).  It would be even more awesome for other folks to bear and share
> that burden and help build or refine the existing tools to help with
> automation.
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Tom Morris <tfmorris@gmail.com
> <mailto:tfmorris@gmail.com>> wrote:
>     On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl
>     <mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl>> wrote:
>         I got messed up with my mail splitting: but I really want to
>         flag that Thad's
>             http://lists.w3.org/Archives/__Public/public-vocabs/2013Oct/__0142.html
>             <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Oct/0142.html>
>         is really awesome.And seems a good case in favour of SKOS data,
>         for all those who want to do something similar but can't handle
>         the poliferation of namespaces.
>     One caution - that example isn't representative.  Of the 389,668
>     Library of Congress Subject Heading (LCSH) concepts in Freebase,
>     only 7,842 have been linked to an equivalent Freebase topic.  Also
>     the LCSH was  loaded in 2010 and, as far as I'm aware, hasn't been
>     updated since.  I suspect the hierarchy is relatively stable, but
>     the lack of currency is something else to be aware of.
>     It demonstrates interesting possibilities, but it isn't useful for
>     much in its current form.
>     Tom
> --
> -Thad
> Thad on Freebase.com <http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry>
> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>

Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 13:34:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:32 UTC