W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > October 2013

Re: schema.org/MedicalClinic question

From: Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:38:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMbipBvQxpY6MESOCzPupWCN5mcsmEZmKKB7iKywerch471gjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Deering <david@touchpointdigital.net>
Cc: Public Vocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Um, that concluding sentence was missing a few words; should have read:  "And
feel free to reopen the thread there if you have further questions (if
you're on Google Plus and have joined that Community.)"


On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> Since you're using schema.org already, there's no reason to use
> data-vocabulary.org for reviews and ratings.
>
> The warning you saw is indeed a confusing message because schema.org does
> not use "votes" but rather:
> ratingCount - for votes
> reviewCount - for count
>
> The Structured Data Testing Tool warning message here has simply not been
> updated to reflect properties used with schema.org/AggregateRating.
>
> For more on this topic see this post and the comments attached there:
> https://plus.google.com/104247085577497637405/posts/fFfwksGiMtv
>
> And feel reopen the thread there if have further questions (you're on
> Google Plus and have joined that Community.)
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:59 AM, David Deering <
> david@touchpointdigital.net> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have any thoughts on this?  Any help would be greatly
>> appreciated.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>
Received on Friday, 11 October 2013 22:39:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:32 UTC