W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > October 2013

Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion

From: Jason Douglas <jasondouglas@google.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:21:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEiKvUB686n8VPftkDTYrW04Bj42WBkNzg9rtBSqnn8vkmenuA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, jean delahousse <delahousse.jean@gmail.com>, Guha <guha@google.com>, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>, Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, PublicVocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> > ... in many many cases URLs can be used, ... but sometimes the thing
> > we point to can also be usefully described inline too, with further
> > properties and relationships. 'URL' is very very vague and doesn't
> > address the inline description possibility.
>
> Thanks Dan. I guess I'm failing to imagine a scenario where someone
> who was describing a job posting would want to describe an
> occupational category inline and relate it to other occupational
> categories (broader, narrower, etc), or make other skos like
> assertions.
>

Doesn't *somebody" have to define it inline?  Otherwise, how does it exist
for other people to refer to by URL?  :)
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 15:21:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:32 UTC