Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion

On 10/8/13 2:20 AM, Martin Hepp wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2013, at 11:22 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
>
>> Can anyone here _not_ live with EnumConcept, given the various
>> constraints and viewpoints expressed so far?
>>
>> Dan
> I personally would prefer TerminologyConcept or TerminologicalConcept, because the notion of Enumeration and in particular the abbreviation Enum is, IMO, a bit difficult for broad audiences.
> But I am not religious about it. EnumConcept could do.

+1

Personally, I believe "Terminology" and "Concept" concatenation conveys 
the goal of this effort more effectively than "Enum" which is too skewed 
towards programmers.

Kingsley
>
> Martin
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> martin hepp
> e-business & web science research group
> universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
>
> e-mail:  hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
> phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
> fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
> www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
>           http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
> skype:   mfhepp
> twitter: mfhepp
>
> Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
> =================================================================
> * Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
>
>
>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen