W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > October 2013

Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 15:15:39 -0700
Message-ID: <5251E10B.5010205@kcoyle.net>
To: public-vocabs@w3.org
+1. Also, I took an look at the list of schema properties in the RDFa 
display, and there are a number whose names would be best qualified in 
this way. Although changing something that already exists is a Bad Idea, 
it's an even Worse Idea the longer the terms are in existence. Many come 
in through the Health and Medical Types, but there are some throughout.

kc

On 10/6/13 2:49 PM, Guha wrote:
> Could we rename 'Concept', which sounds too general, to SkosConcept or
> something like that?
>
> Would be great to see a worked out example.
>
> guha
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet
> <scorlosquet@gmail.com <mailto:scorlosquet@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I've added the SKOS proposal sent by Jean Delahousse to the wiki [1]
>     and converted it to a schema.org <http://schema.org> RDFS document [2].
>
>     We should probably discuss this proposal further now that's it's on
>     the wiki.
>
>     Steph.
>
>     [1] http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/SKOS
>     [2]
>     https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/raw-file/tip/schema.org/ext/skos.html
>
>
>
>     On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org
>     <mailto:danbri@danbri.org>> wrote:
>
>         Hi!
>
>         On 10 January 2013 11:13, jean delahousse
>         <delahousse.jean@gmail.com <mailto:delahousse.jean@gmail.com>>
>         wrote:
>          > Hello,
>          >
>          > I have worked on a integration of SKOS into Schema.org.
>          >
>          > The idea is to be able to publish pages about concepts
>         described in a
>          > controled vocabulary and to describe the controlled
>         vocabulary itself.
>          > Use case can be the publication of a library controlled
>         vocabulary as Rameau
>          > from the French National Library
>         (http://data.bnf.fr/13318366/musique/) or
>          > authorities by Library of Congress
>          > (http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2003003686.html) ,
>         or a glossary
>          > in a web site.
>          >
>          > I attached the draft. I would be happy to go on with this
>         project with some
>          > of you.
>
>         Thanks for making a concrete proposal - this is really positive!
>         Your
>         reward is that I ask something more from you ;)
>
>         Would you have time to make an HTML+RDFa+RDFS version of this
>         proposal?
>
>         There are some examples in our WebSchemas area of W3C Mercurial
>         repo, here:
>
>         https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/file/default/schema.org/ext
>
>         I hope they are almost self-explanatory. We can get you access
>         or just
>         send along HTML by mail/wiki. If you don't have time I 100%
>         understand, but I'm trying to build a workflow here that doesn't
>         suffer from my being a bottleneck, so hopefully this
>         machine-readable
>         proposals mechanism will help...
>
>         cheers,
>
>         Dan
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     Steph.
>
>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
Received on Sunday, 6 October 2013 22:16:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:32 UTC