W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > October 2013

Re: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard

From: Andy Heath <andyheath@axelrod.plus.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 00:04:40 +0100
Message-ID: <524B5508.6040906@axelrod.plus.com>
To: Madeleine Rothberg <madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org>
CC: "a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com" <a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Madeleine said:

> I believe we need both accessHazard=flashing and accessHazard=noFlashing,
> etc.. This is because there are three cases we'd like to distinguish:
>
> 1. checked and it's fine
> 2. checked and it is NOT fine
> 3. didn't check
>
> "Didn't check" can be signified by no metadata -- this will be most of the
> content on the Web. In cases where someone has checked, let's record both
> positive and negative states.
>
> -Madeleine

I completely concur.

andy




andy
andyheath@axelrod.plus.com
-- 
__________________
Andy Heath
http://axelafa.com
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2013 23:05:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:32 UTC