Re: MiniSKOS proposal: add Topic, an equivalentClass to skos:Concept, and relate schema properties to it.

Great! I buy it :)

2013/11/19 Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>

> FINALLY !  (Thad gets to use a generic container for his "categories" and
> "list items" that are cleverly disguised (i.e. mapped) as SKOS Concepts
> already !)
>
>
>> This would be our way of saying that (sometimes) the values of these
>> properties would take links into existing controlled vocabularies,
>> typically but not necessarily documented using W3C SKOS in (hopefully)
>> RDFa. By doing so, we make it easier for schema.org data to use
>> hierarchies of controlled codes, alternate and multilingual labels,
>>
>
>
>
>> and links between such vocabularies.
>>
>>
> This last point being the most important of them all... the light switch
> is now officially "ON", folks... you just need to screw in the light bulb
> to make the "web" become the "structured web"....  I.E. link those damn
> vocabularies.
>
>
>> All other information about a Topic would be expressed in
>> non-schema.org vocabulary (broader etc.), most likely SKOS.
>>
>>
> Makes logical sense.  Why mess up a good thing :)
>
>
>>  Dan
>>
>>
> --
> -Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
>



-- 

*Bernard Vatant*
Vocabularies & Data Engineering
Tel :  + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59
Skype : bernard.vatant
http://google.com/+BernardVatant
--------------------------------------------------------
*Mondeca*
3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France
www.mondeca.com
Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews>
----------------------------------------------------------

Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2013 20:51:20 UTC