- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 18:52:25 -0700
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Jim Klo <jim.klo@sri.com>, Yaar Schnitman <yaar@google.com>, Steve Macbeth <Steve.Macbeth@microsoft.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 14 May 2013 18:49, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > Laying out some side by side comparisons of the two models would be an > excellent start, as would having a clear side-by-side comparison of > the intended use cases, features and requirements. From there we can > see what alignment we can achieve. Agreed. Late last year, we circulated an earlier version of an Actions design, but it didn't have any concrete use cases documented. This latest version is less cryptic, and the accompanying schemas (reservations, orders) give some idea for possible applications. Can you suggest a nice collection of activity streams sample data we could work from? Dan
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2013 01:52:51 UTC