W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Proposal for new Schema.org extension: Charts

From: Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:54:02 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMbipBvD8KHuRsmdL6ZCamgxXJP5+aegW9zdDChZYK=8Wa53-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Raza Zaidi <raza@gigaom.com>
Cc: Public Vocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Are the charts in question image files?  And, if so, what sort of
properties "specific to charts" do you have in mind can't be adequately
described by ImageObject [1]?

Having said that, it's possible that there's a case for a "Chart" as a more
specific type of CreativeWork or ImageObject.  Probably the former, as
charts can be displayed using mechanisms aside from images, such as SVG
rendering [2].

Regarding the best way of going about building an extension [3] that might
be included in schema.org (and I speak here only from my observations of
how extensions that have been ended up being moved to the core
schema.orgvocabulary), I would suggest that the first step is to start
building out
the extension in a publicly-accessible location where your collaborators at
GigaOM and others can provide feedback.  This is in part how medical
additions made their way into schema.org [4], although in aggregate the
process of building out medical extensions involved a much greater degree
of collaboration [5] [6].  It has also been the course pursued by the
Learning Resource Metadata Initiative.

You'll also learn a lot by looking at the
"WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals" page [7], where Dan Brickley states
(more clearly and eloquently:) the points I've made above, and a lot more.

Hope this helps!

[1] http://schema.org/ImageObject
[2] http://datamarket.com/topic/58/canada (example)
[3] http://schema.org/docs/extension.html
[4] http://www.evandavis.org/schema/
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2012Apr/0074.html
[6] http://blog.schema.org/2012/06/health-and-medical-vocabulary-for.html
[7] http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals


On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Raza Zaidi <raza@gigaom.com> wrote:

> At GigaOM, we've been producing charts for both our news site (
> http://www.gigaom.com) used in articles and our research site (
> http://pro.gigaom.com) used in research reports...We've been thinking of
> extending CreativeWork to have some properties that are specific to charts
> (and the underlying data)...
>
> This whole process is totally new to me...and I'd like some guidance on
> how to get it out there...we are currently defining it and should be done
> with that in about one month. We will go back and add the markup to our
> existing charts...we will also publish the extensions somewhere on
> gigaom.com ...
>
> what then? how do we get it up on the schema.org sites so others can
> start using as well? when do search engines start noticing??
>
> any guidance is appreciated....
>
> regards, raza
>
> --
> Raza Zaidi
> VP of Product & Technology
> raza@gigaom.com
> +1(415)713-7495
>
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 15:54:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 25 January 2013 15:54:30 GMT