W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Proposal: accept Comment item type for CreativeWork/comment

From: John Breslin <john.breslin@nuigalway.ie>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:03:57 -0800
To: <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD1CAA1D.33940%john.breslin@nuigalway.ie>
Hi George -

I agree ­ comment pointing to UserComments doesnıt make sense.

The description of comment property is ³Comments, typically from users, on
this CreativeWork.² so it sounds like they are pointing to the comments
themselves. But UserComments, as a sub-type of UserInteractions, is just a
number.

How can this be fixed without breaking existing deployments?

More generally Iıd like to include this in the Discussion proposal to have a
proper way of threading (or not threading) these comments / posts...

John
--
John Breslin http://johnbreslin.org http://linkd.in/johnbreslin
Lecturer, Electronic Engineering, NUI Galway http://www.eee.nuigalway.ie
Researcher, Social Software and Semantic Web, DERI http://www.deri.ie







image.png
(image/png attachment: image.png)

Received on Thursday, 17 January 2013 03:04:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 17 January 2013 03:04:35 GMT