- From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:23:53 +0100
- To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org Org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Mike Bergman <mike@mkbergman.com>, Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@oclc.org>
Hi Ed:
You are right. However, we will then likely need two forums. I think that practitioners from particular industries who are interested in using or extending schema.org are rather turned off by a lot of generic "vocabularies for the Web" issues.
Martin
On Jan 13, 2013, at 8:04 AM, Ed Summers wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Martin Hepp
> <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:
>> This list should, IMHO, really just be about
>>
>> a) concrete extensions of schema.org for certain domains or usage ("we need an additional property for type XYZ for the following reasons") and
>> b) issues with the current extension mechanisms or concrete proposals on how to enhance them,
>
> I don't disagree that these are in scope for discussion. But isn't
> public-vocabs a discussion list to support the W3C Web Schemas Task
> Force, which has its own somewhat broader charter and scope [1]?
>
> Personally I would like to see a little less focus on getting the
> models just right, and a little more focus on using this W3C
> discussion space as neutral territory to discuss how we are using the
> vocabularies in applications and tools.
>
> //Ed
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/interest/webschema.html
>
--------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
twitter: mfhepp
Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Received on Sunday, 13 January 2013 10:24:25 UTC