Re: schema.org weekend reading: Actions/Activities; Audience draft, and Class/Property. from Dietrich Schulten on 2013-01-03 (public-vocabs@w3.org from January 2013)

From: Dietrich Schulten <ds@escalon.de>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:07:16 +0100
To: <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <13bff7320a5.2763.78a08d5134d8b1c7d32e1da05a71bfd3@escalon.de>

After looking a bit deeper into the offers/Offer type with its 
businessFunction and product property I think it already has the 
capability to express many business models,  like sell,  lease out etc.
As I already said in 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Jan/0000.html, my 
feeling is, it might be better to have a more fine-grained way to 
express possible actions: a small set of actions which define their 
meaning from the Thing they belong to. The possible action should not 
be attached to the Thing (Movie...) , but to subproperties, like 
acceptAction for offer, addAction for ratings etc. Comments?

Best regards
Dietrich


Gesendet mit AquaMail für Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com

Received on Thursday, 3 January 2013 08:07:48 UTC