W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Incomplete reviews Schema - why?

From: Robert Kost <kostrjk@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 07:46:46 -0500
Message-Id: <E6A36E19-5578-4E95-A7E5-FFB525C4582C@gmail.com>
To: SchemaDot Org <public-vocabs@w3.org>

oops sorry:

http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets?url=thematix.com%2FAMNH%2FPicturingScience.html&html=



On Feb 5, 2013, at 6:08 AM, Matthias Tylkowski <matthias@binarypark.org> wrote:

> Hello Robert,
> please check the URL you are using carefully.
> 
> Regards
> Matthias Tylkowski
> CTO Binarypark
> 
> Am 04.02.2013 22:56, schrieb Robert Kost:
>> I'm getting this here as well.  Not sure why.
>> 
>> thanks
>> 
>> Rob
>> 
>> On Feb 4, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Καραγιαννίδης Γιάννης <giankar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> I'm testing the reviews schema with the foolowing data:
>>> 
>>> Item 
>>> type:	http://schema.org/review
>>> property:	
>>> author:	XXXX XXXXX
>>> name:	Bla bla bla bla bla
>>> reviewrating:	
>>> Item 2
>>> datepublished:	2012-16-07
>>> reviewbody:	Bla Bla Bla Bl
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Google's rich snippet tool, I'm getting a "Warning: Incomplete microdata with schema.org." 
>>> 
>>> I've compared my code with other examples and I cannot spot any difference on the properties that I make use and they 're making use - am I missing something? What does the reviews schema require in order to be verified?
>>> 
>>> E.G. the reviewrating Item 2 is validated correctly
>>> 
>>> Thank you
>>> Giannis
>> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 12:50:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2013 12:50:35 GMT