W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Schema.org v1.0e published: Order schema, Accessibility properties

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 10:10:41 +0000
Message-ID: <CAFfrAFoB-i6YLsArmPKnnEHQ14eXgzNnV6-fPji74v4BLxDRBQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>
Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Public Vocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
On 4 December 2013 23:07, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com> wrote:
> Swell stuff!
>
> Are there plans to bring the previously published draft specification on the
> Google Developer site [1] in line with this new specification on schema.org?
>
> Properties only on schema.org:
> confirmationNumber
> discount / discountCode / discountCurrency
> isGift
> orderedItem
> paymentDue / PaymentMethod / PaymentMethodID / paymentUrl
>
> Properties only on Google Developer:
> price / priceCurrency / priceSpecification
>
> As well - and probably the most noticable difference - the Google version
> uses the property seller instead of the schema.org property merchant.
>
> Because the earlier version exists on Google Developer I know this is
> chiefly a Google-esque issue, but insofar as there's now published version
> of schema.org/Order *on* schema.org, it would obviously be mutually
> advantageous if the seller/merchant property nomenclature was normalized -
> perhaps it's in the works.

As a first step we'll get a link from the google work-in-progress docs
to the final finished thing. I can't say for sure how long until
various Google products understand the new vocabulary, although
Google's Structured Data Testing Tool should at least already not
complain when it sees new (v1.0d, v1.0e) terms. Work in progress!

Dan


> [1]
> https://developers.google.com/gmail/actions/reference/order#specification
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/4/13 10:54 AM, Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> you can find more information on what has changed since the last version
>> here: http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/dif/dif_schema_1.0d-1.0e.html
>>
>> The Schema.org entry on LOV is as well updated (versions file and
>> difference can be found on the timeline):
>> http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabulary_schema.html
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pierre-Yves.
>>
>>
>> Awesome on both fronts re., schema.org version 1.0e and LOV's cool delta
>> page!
>>
>> Kingsley
>>
>>
>>
>> Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Schema.org version 1.0e has been published. This release includes a
>>> schema for describing Orders, see http://schema.org/Order as well as
>>> the Accessibility properties for http://schema.org/CreativeWork
>>> pre-announced recently,
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Nov/0190.html
>>> (blog post on its way).
>>>
>>> It also fixes a small bug with http://schema.org/validFrom (in 1.0d
>>> made the text overly focussed on Civic Actions, and we revert the
>>> expected type back to DateTime).
>>>
>>> As always, a machine-readable RDFa dump of the entire schema is
>>> available at http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html and bugfixes,
>>> discussion etc. are welcomed here.
>>>
>>> Many thanks to everyone who was involved!
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> (trying to get in first with an announcement for a change ;)
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kingsley Idehen
>> Founder & CEO
>> OpenLink Software
>> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
>> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
>> Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
>> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
>> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2013 10:11:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:36 UTC